Culloden Battlefield Paths

·         In summer 2005 there was an NTS meeting in Edinburgh concerning Culloden Battlefield and new Visitor Centre prompted by the 1745 Association, as it wished to assist with the historical accuracy.  It was implied that there would be future meetings but none was  held.

·          In early March 2007 it was found that some of the Battlefield paths had been dug up such that the Clan Donald wooden markers and the Keppoch and Clan Donald stones were widely separated and up dead end paths making the usual circular tour by the Clan Donald group at the annual Culloden celebration impossible

·         On 16 March 2007 the Project Manager at the Culloden Visitor Centre apologized and said they could have ploughed up the section between the stones and the Hanoverian line if they had known how Clan Donald would feel!

·         Objectors then received a ‘Statement on the new arrangements for footpaths and trees on the Battlefield’, but it transpired that there were two versions. These both finish with:          A Statement on the site as a whole’ :

1.       The NTS has worked very hard to ensure that the impact of visitors to the site is minimised, and instead, to ensure that the conservation of the battlefield is its priority for all time. The site is open and accessible to visitors all year round and in formulating its policies manages the site for the greater good of all and not for the needs of small groups or individuals. That way it can ensure that its policies are sustainable and defensible.

2.       The NTS has worked very hard to ensure that the impact of visitors to the site is minimised, and instead, to ensure that the conservation of the battlefield is its priority for all time. Interpretation of the battlefield will be by minimum intervention and with the minimum interpretation points necessary to present the story. This will be supported by the use of Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) to provide ‘virtual’ information and interpretation of the site.

The site is open and accessible to visitors all year round and in formulating its policies, the Trust will manage the site for the greater good of all. That way it can ensure that its policies are sustainable and defensible.

The first version was received by someone who wrote to the Chairman of the NTS.  Both this ‘Statement’ and a ‘Dear Clan Members’ e-mail sent out by the Project Manager attaching the statement and a plan (which did not make the situation clear) referred to the “MacDonald” and Keppoch Stones, instead of the “Clan Donald” and Keppoch Stones.

·         Many objectors worldwide, including Glengarry, did not receive replies from the Project Manager or simply received the ‘Statement’.

·          On 5 April there was an NTS Highland Members Group AGM. The Highland Director was due to speak, but someone from PR took his place and when she was asked about the Battlefield paths problem she said that this was a question to be taken higher up. 

·         People disillusioned with the response – or lack of it – from the Project Manager started writing to the Chairman. Her responses gave no opening for any negotiation whatsoever, maintaining that decisions were made in the best interest of the Trust and its wider membership.

·          At the rededication of the Battlefield on 14 April, prior to the annual commemoration, the Chairman made a point of stating how much acclaim had been received from historians. No evidence was given of any involvement of clan representatives.

·         At the Clan Donald Forum at Armadale on 9 June the High Chief, Macdonald of Macdonald, agreed that the High Council would write to the President of the National Trust for Scotland, The Earl of Dalkeith (who is now the Dukeof Buccleuch and Queensberry).

·         Al Manning passed information round Clan Donald about Clan Livingstone objecting to the plan by the NTS to change the wooden marker board  Appin Regiment’  to an engraved Caithness stone marker to read "Appin Regiment - Stewarts and MacLarens".

·         At the AGM of the NTS in Culloden Academy on 29 September, 2007, it was suggested that the NTS could be alienating many of its members, as well as clansfolk both at home and abroad because of the changes being made on Culloden Battlefield. The Chairman defended the Appin Regiment decision and again reiterated that historians were very complimentary about the new arrangement of paths and said that she had already dealt with objections. Afterwards, in private conversation, the President, the Duke of Buccleuch, said that the High Council’s letter had been received by him two days’ after the death of his father earlier that month and he had not been able to deal with it at that time.

·         3 January, 2008, this picture was taken:

·        

 

·         It is not clear as to whom it is best to write, but there is a suggestion that letters should be addressed to the President, with a copy to the Chairman. An e-mail address is available only for the Chairman.

His Grace The Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry, KBE, DL, President

 

Ms. Shonaig Macpherson, Chairman

 

The National Trust for Scotland

Wemyss House

Charlotte Square

EDINBURGH

EH2 4ET

 

SMacpherson@nts.org.uk

 

 

 

 

Revised January 2008